Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Open topics on the Contest itself, to include results-watch threads and other items of note.
User avatar
czing
Posts: 112
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2019 6:08 am

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby czing » Thu Jul 25, 2019 3:14 pm

Oh yes I know it is very early for me to be thinking much about it. But like the scene from the Simpsons "it can flash fry a buffalo in 45 seconds"..."but I want it now" --- I am being a little Homer-ish right now LOL. I think in part because the story I submitted is one of my favourite stories I've written (it's a little different than a lot of my other ones) so I'm anxious to either hear it has achieved unexpected heights or it is available for me to send it to other markets. Maybe I just need to get more stories into a state for submitting them so I always have something to send out :)
HM - Q1,Q3 v 36
R - Q4 v 36

User avatar
Henckel
Posts: 289
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2013 6:30 pm
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Contact:

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby Henckel » Thu Jul 25, 2019 9:34 pm

disgruntledpeony wrote:
czing wrote:Anyhow if anyone else wants to switch gears from Q2 to Q3 with me you are welcome wotf011

I've switched, but considering they're still judging Q2 I wouldn't expect results here for a month or two. Personal opinion is we'll be lucky to hear back by the end of September. wotf017


From experience, it normally takes four months. Thus, were looking at the last week of October. (A Thursday to be exact ha ha) also, I'm pretty sure all results are releaes at the same time. So, even though you submitted really early, you're likely to get results when everyone else does.

And yes, I'm losing sleep already, hoping I win.
(2014) V31 Q1 – R
(2018) V35 Q3 – HM
(2019) V36 Q3 – HM
(2019) V36 Q4 – SHM
(2020) V37 Q1 – ?

User avatar
disgruntledpeony
Posts: 1114
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2015 7:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby disgruntledpeony » Fri Jul 26, 2019 2:42 am

Henckel wrote:
disgruntledpeony wrote:
czing wrote:Anyhow if anyone else wants to switch gears from Q2 to Q3 with me you are welcome wotf011

I've switched, but considering they're still judging Q2 I wouldn't expect results here for a month or two. Personal opinion is we'll be lucky to hear back by the end of September. wotf017


From experience, it normally takes four months. Thus, were looking at the last week of October. (A Thursday to be exact ha ha) also, I'm pretty sure all results are releaes at the same time. So, even though you submitted really early, you're likely to get results when everyone else does.

And yes, I'm losing sleep already, hoping I win.

It used to take closer to 2 to three months outside of Q1, I thought. Q1 always runs long.
If a person offend you, and you are in doubt as to whether it was intentional or not, do not resort to extreme measures; simply watch your chance and hit him with a brick. ~ Mark Twain

R, SF, SHM, SHM, SHM, F, R, HM, SHM, R, HM, R, F

User avatar
czing
Posts: 112
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2019 6:08 am

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby czing » Fri Jul 26, 2019 7:36 am

So start holding my breath at the end of September? I'm sure I can make it until the end of October if I need to :)
HM - Q1,Q3 v 36
R - Q4 v 36

User avatar
DoctorJest
Posts: 190
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2014 11:18 pm
Location: California
Contact:

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby DoctorJest » Sun Jul 28, 2019 9:19 am

There's definitely a range here. My current running average for responses reports itself as 88 days, but that's based on my submission date versus response date, so needs tinkering. (Also, I only have six data-points so far, so this is all a bit limited.) Adjusting to look at the quarter cut-off dates instead of my submission dates all the same, though, I get this:

* The average is almost exactly 80 days, but for mostly known reasons, Q1/Q2 this year have been the longest -- they skew this number a bit
* Slowest response-time to date was 115 days, for Q2 2019 just gone
* Fastest response-time to date was 38 days, for Q4 2016
WotF: R:0 / HM:6 / sHM:2 / SF:0 / F:0
Currently working on entry for Q1.v37...

User avatar
czing
Posts: 112
Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2019 6:08 am

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby czing » Sun Jul 28, 2019 4:34 pm

DoctorJest wrote:There's definitely a range here. My current running average for responses reports itself as 88 days, but that's based on my submission date versus response date, so needs tinkering. (Also, I only have six data-points so far, so this is all a bit limited.) Adjusting to look at the quarter cut-off dates instead of my submission dates all the same, though, I get this:

* The average is almost exactly 80 days, but for mostly known reasons, Q1/Q2 this year have been the longest -- they skew this number a bit
* Slowest response-time to date was 115 days, for Q2 2019 just gone
* Fastest response-time to date was 38 days, for Q4 2016


I love when people have data to crunch!

Thanks for sharing what you've got.
HM - Q1,Q3 v 36
R - Q4 v 36

User avatar
chuckt
Posts: 270
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2019 9:12 am

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby chuckt » Sun Jul 28, 2019 4:52 pm

Vol 35 Q3 looks like it came in waves--end of September through early October?
36 R,R,R, SHM

User avatar
Beth Powers
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat Oct 18, 2014 3:12 pm
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby Beth Powers » Sun Jul 28, 2019 7:33 pm

czing wrote:I love when people have data to crunch!


I'll add some crunchy data: The earliest I've ever heard back on Q3 is August 17th (and that's not a fluke because I also got results on the 18th for another Q3), and the latest was November 10th (that one might be a bit of an outlier, but I did get results November 2nd once too)

Overall, I received 2 responses in August, 5 in September, 2 in October, and 2 in November.

Of course, that doesn't take into account that my results were not always the same, and I started submitting in the days of paper subs, and any day can be Thursday, regardless of what the numbers say.... wotf007

User avatar
JVAshley
Posts: 247
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 5:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby JVAshley » Mon Jul 29, 2019 9:38 am

Thanks for all the data crunching!
I love a good spreadsheet filled with info. wotf009
1x SF
3x HM
2x R

Michael Kingswood
Posts: 43
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 8:49 pm
Location: San Diego
Contact:

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby Michael Kingswood » Thu Aug 01, 2019 5:28 pm

He does give out Honorable Mentions, SHMs, semi finalists for those who don't reach the finalist stage. So far if he doesn't like a story no one does. I have heard the statement about it just not being a good fit for wotF but its been too long, that is no comfort for me. I have sent almost every type of spec tale there is to WotF, even before Dave came on board. I have 170 or so stories that I have or are sending out. I have sent maybe half to WotF, maybe more. I have sent somewhere around three-fourths of them to every market that might be a fit for them I could find. Anthologies as well as magazines. Many of the markets are no longer in existence. I found a new one the other day I might be sending 20 to 30 stories to. Not all at the same time of course, if they stay in business long enough. I don't know how long they will take to send a note back to me since I sent my first story there recently. As I said if one editor rejects something they all do, without a second glance usually. I know enough now to know that a large number of my first stories were badly written and to know how they were. So I assume I have improved significantly over the years but I have no scale to know where I am. For a couple of years I perceived myself to be almost pro quality but not quite but now I doubt that. Good stories maybe? You have to be better than good to get in WotF and most other markets but good is still a good place to be, it is on the way. Am I still climbing out of lousy? I don't think my writing is that bad but again I don't know, even though I have gotten a couple of signs that I am better than lousy. Mediocre then maybe? Again I like to think I am better than that but (Shoulder shrug). Most around here are good if not better, they get evidence of that. Those that aren't usually improve with their time here. I see very little evidence that I have moved forward more than a couple of feet from when I first joined here. Quite a few of those here when I joined aren't here any more because they got in or pro-ed out. I miss a couple of them. One person died. A couple just left for other reasons. Some that have been for a while probably are tired of me complaining-walloing in self pity-discouragment etc, even though I don't do it that often and haven't done it for quite a few months since I have not been here. Been working on novels, writing really short stories and some longer ones. Still I am writing and I am sending stuff in again. At least a few markets that haven't closed or are too full. Oh I wanted to say that the last 25 or so stories of the 170 only have one to three rejections since I haven't been sending out a lot of stories. But so many are still filled up, sent to almost every market I could find.


I've been away from the forums for a few weeks and haven't read everything after this. So apologies if someone else already said what I'm about to say.

Right. On with it.

Dude. If you've got 170 stories sitting around doing nothing, you are leaving money - possibly serious money - on the table.

You need to indie publish them. ALL of them. Then you need to put them into bundles of ten and publish those. Find some common themes or characters and re-bundle them along those lines, then publish those as separate collections. Bundle them by year written and publish those collections.

The problem I've noticed with editors is they become very jaded. They read thousands and thousands of stories, and so their palates become refined. But maybe a bit TOO refined. Something a super-experienced editors views as trite and repetitive, or not beautiful enough, or derivative, or whatever the literary phrase that just means "I didn't like it", can - and probably will - be something that an actual reader will enjoy, if not love. Because while editors see it all, readers don't. They are more receptive, and more forgiving. In some ways.

That said, there ARE super hardcore readers who are absolutely ruthless in their assessments. But they are a very vocal minority.

You say you feel like you've not moved forward in your writing. That is almost certainly not true. You are a much better writer now than you were at story one. You could not possibly have not improved, as much practice as you've put in.

Let the readers have access to what you've produced. You'll be surprised how many like what you've created.

Then create some more.

wotf009

V/R,
Michael
Michael Kingswood
http://michaelkingswood.com

SHM x2
HM x11
R x11

LDWriter2
Posts: 3491
Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 8:59 pm
Location: Central Cailf.
Contact:

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby LDWriter2 » Wed Aug 14, 2019 7:52 pm

Michael Kingswood wrote:
He does give out Honorable Mentions, SHMs, semi finalists for those who don't reach the finalist stage. So far if he doesn't like a story no one does. I have heard the statement about it just not being a good fit for wotF but its been too long, that is no comfort for me. I have sent almost every type of spec tale there is to WotF, even before Dave came on board. I have 170 or so stories that I have or are sending out. I have sent maybe half to WotF, maybe more. I have sent somewhere around three-fourths of them to every market that might be a fit for them I could find. Anthologies as well as magazines. Many of the markets are no longer in existence. I found a new one the other day I might be sending 20 to 30 stories to. Not all at the same time of course, if they stay in business long enough. I don't know how long they will take to send a note back to me since I sent my first story there recently. As I said if one editor rejects something they all do, without a second glance usually. I know enough now to know that a large number of my first stories were badly written and to know how they were. So I assume I have improved significantly over the years but I have no scale to know where I am. For a couple of years I perceived myself to be almost pro quality but not quite but now I doubt that. Good stories maybe? You have to be better than good to get in WotF and most other markets but good is still a good place to be, it is on the way. Am I still climbing out of lousy? I don't think my writing is that bad but again I don't know, even though I have gotten a couple of signs that I am better than lousy. Mediocre then maybe? Again I like to think I am better than that but (Shoulder shrug). Most around here are good if not better, they get evidence of that. Those that aren't usually improve with their time here. I see very little evidence that I have moved forward more than a couple of feet from when I first joined here. Quite a few of those here when I joined aren't here any more because they got in or pro-ed out. I miss a couple of them. One person died. A couple just left for other reasons. Some that have been for a while probably are tired of me complaining-walloing in self pity-discouragment etc, even though I don't do it that often and haven't done it for quite a few months since I have not been here. Been working on novels, writing really short stories and some longer ones. Still I am writing and I am sending stuff in again. At least a few markets that haven't closed or are too full. Oh I wanted to say that the last 25 or so stories of the 170 only have one to three rejections since I haven't been sending out a lot of stories. But so many are still filled up, sent to almost every market I could find.


I've been away from the forums for a few weeks and haven't read everything after this. So apologies if someone else already said what I'm about to say.

Right. On with it.

Dude. If you've got 170 stories sitting around doing nothing, you are leaving money - possibly serious money - on the table.

You need to indie publish them. ALL of them. Then you need to put them into bundles of ten and publish those. Find some common themes or characters and re-bundle them along those lines, then publish those as separate collections. Bundle them by year written and publish those collections.

The problem I've noticed with editors is they become very jaded. They read thousands and thousands of stories, and so their palates become refined. But maybe a bit TOO refined. Something a super-experienced editors views as trite and repetitive, or not beautiful enough, or derivative, or whatever the literary phrase that just means "I didn't like it", can - and probably will - be something that an actual reader will enjoy, if not love. Because while editors see it all, readers don't. They are more receptive, and more forgiving. In some ways.

That said, there ARE super hardcore readers who are absolutely ruthless in their assessments. But they are a very vocal minority.

You say you feel like you've not moved forward in your writing. That is almost certainly not true. You are a much better writer now than you were at story one. You could not possibly have not improved, as much practice as you've put in.

Let the readers have access to what you've produced. You'll be surprised how many like what you've created.

Then create some more.

wotf009

V/R,
Michael


Just saw this post. Yes, I think I have improved but only one editor thinks so. He isn't buying-well sort of, in a way I just found out. Maybe I went from being very lousy to maybe on the bottom of good. And we know that good isn't good enough. But maybe a couple readers think I am good. I have one fan on something called mewe.com and one or two on Facebook. Anyway. I plan on doing some five story sets. And two longer, 20 story, anthologies-I have a couple indie published novels. Those stories are from another group I have set aside to not send in. They have all been published online already. Right now I need to try a cover for five WESTERN tales and then figure out a cover for five stories in a set titled "Foibles". Plus one for "Isolation" But The newer, hopefully better, stories I still want to send in if I can get back into the habit of doing that.
Working on turning Lead into Gold.

Four HMs From WotF
The latest was Q1'12
HM-quarter 4 Volume 32
One HM for another contest
published in Strange New Worlds Ten.
Another HM http://onthepremises.com/minis/mini_18.html

Wulf Moon
Posts: 1218
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2017 2:54 pm
Location: Olympic Peninsula, WA
Contact:

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby Wulf Moon » Thu Aug 15, 2019 12:37 pm

This is for LDWriter's post, but it's a good reminder to all. Every writer goes through rejection. Frank Herbert had the most brilliant SF novel of the 20th Century rejected by every publisher he sent it to, and finally got a car repair manual publishing company--Chiltons--to publish it, and that was only because the other editors at the company wanted the guy that bought it to fail and be fired!

Long spells of rejection are a part of your start up. Recognize that everyone must pass this trial by fire to make it. And don't forget that our first million words are our practice sessions. Novice writers tend to forget that, and keep circulating stories that editors immediately spot as sub par. We can't see it, because they're our own beautiful babies. But some of those are ugly babies, and yet we keep wondering why they didn't win the beauty pageant. :)

This doesn't mean you can't turn lead into gold during your long and painful "million words" start up. And it doesn't mean some of the stories rejected by Dave can't be sold elsewhere--I've had two pro paying sales that only got certificates here, and I know of others that have had good results with stories turned down by Dave, Brad Torgerson's story he sold to Analog and winning a Reader's Choice probably being the most famous example. Much if it is being in the right place at the right time with the right story. And much of it is dogged persistence, which you've already proven you have.

If you know you are a writer, you write. Period. And if you want to be a published writer, you find ways to stomach the rejections so you can keep sending until you write that story that connects. It is critical that you don't lose faith in who you are, and that you keep practicing your craft and studying those that have mastered the craft. Often, those masters like Dave conduct workshops. If you want to change the learning curve, the best thing you can do is take a course by the man judging this contest. You'll get insight into his preferences like no one else can.

Part of the reason I went to Superstars Writing Seminar this past February was to do that. I signed up for a workshop with Dave. I won before arriving there, but it was a good plan. He teaches there every year. So do some other great WotF judges, like Kevin J Anderson and Rebecca Moesta and Eric Flint. I highly recommend the seminar--outside of the WotF workshop, it's the best I've ever attended. It can give you an edge, and can certainly inspire you as you see all these writers on the path, surviving the same trials that you are trying to survive right now. There is power in knowing that you are not alone. If any of you are serious about building a career in professional writing, find a way to go to that seminar. I'll vouch for it. So did Eric Flint when he was at Hollywood with us. And Kevin J is also a founder and organizes it, so it goes without saying how he feels about it. If you are poor, apply for their scholarship. If you've got some money, find a way to go. Here's my code to get you $100 off on admissions. WMOON

But if you're just looking for the best way to win this contest, I'd take a week long course with Dave. If you can't afford that, he's got shorter ones and even online courses. And if you can't afford that, he's got books and training videos. Some years back, when my writing partner said she wanted to write a novel that would get published, I told her she had to take a course with Dave at all costs. She couldn't afford one of his classroom ones, so she pooled her money together and did an online course. Dave loved her writing. He made her the first writer in his promotional Discovery Program. And he connected her novel with Kevin J. Anderson's WordFire press, and she sold her first novel. We can bemoan the system, and yes, the system to get professionally published sucks--that's why Hubbard invented this contest, but this contest can only help twelve new writers a year. So we have to become proactive, and find ways to give ourselves an edge.

I truly hope that helps. I do hope my experiences will help as well in my "HERE BE DRAGONS" blog and video on the WotF homepage. And Preston has his amazing Topanga Canyon story, and WotF just published his blog as well. Find points of similarity in our stories. Then, go chart your course and NEVER GIVE UP...and you will eventually reach your destination.

All the beast!

Wulf Moon
Wulf Moon http://driftweave.com
Q4 Vol 35 "Super-Duper Moongirl..."
Critters Readers Award: #1, "War Dog," Best SF&F Short Story of 2018
NEW! "Weep No More..." DEEP MAGIC Fall 2019 http://amazon.com/author/wulfmoon

User avatar
Retropianoplayer
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:23 am
Location: Peoria, Arizona

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby Retropianoplayer » Thu Aug 15, 2019 7:31 pm

My remarks are addressed to LDWriter:

Dear, Sir:

170 stories written by you falls into my category of AMAZING.

About rejection, from the tome AN INSIDER's GUIDE TO PUBLISHING BY David Comfort, here are some highlights from the book about rejections or unfortunate incidents which occurred in the lives of the "masters."

"Cervantes had his arm shot off, an insane nephew gunned down Jules Verne. Tolstoy's face was rearranged by a rogue bear. Samuel Pepys was sterilized during a gallstone operation. Marlowe was shanked in a bar brawl . . . Lowry almost got castrated. Kerouac was twice nearly beaten to death in bar brawls. Beckett took a shiv to the chest from a Paris pimp . . .Returning to grieve the death of his friend F. Scott Fitzgerald, Nathaniel West ran a stop sign and, with his wife of two days, was killed in a collision. By that time, F. Scott's wife, Zelda, was a longtime asylum resident who, before being committed, had lain down in front of her husband's town car, and said, 'Drive over me, Scott.'

Margaret Mitchell stepped off a curb on Peachtree and 13th, and was delivered to the hereafter by an off-duty cabbie. . . during an after-work stroll in 1999, Stephen King was struck and nearly killed by a minivan. At the time he was busy with his ON WRITING memoir . . . By the end of his career, fearing that he was being tailed by assassins, Papa was diagnosed as a paranoid psychotic and sent to the Meninger Clinic for shock treatments . . .Harper Lee threw an early draft of To Kill A Mockingbird into the snow . . ."

So, not to belabor the point, best of luck to you. And who knows? Maybe one or more of those one hundred seventy amazing stories will get sold. If not now, maybe in three months. If not three months, maybe in five.

All the best,

Retropianoplayer

User avatar
DaneCurley
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2019 12:22 pm

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby DaneCurley » Sun Aug 18, 2019 8:13 pm

The first response for this Q has been logged on TGDB. A 51-day wait, answered on August 17th.

It begins.

Helge Mahrt
Posts: 71
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2019 4:37 am
Location: Madrid, Spain
Contact:

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby Helge Mahrt » Sun Aug 18, 2019 11:54 pm

DaneCurley wrote:The first response for this Q has been logged on TGDB. A 51-day wait, answered on August 17th.

It begins.


Noooooooo... you shouldn't have told me. Now I won't be able to stop checking my emails. wotf019
R, HM, R
http://www.helgemahrt.com
Sky High, my YA/SciFi novel

User avatar
chuckt
Posts: 270
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2019 9:12 am

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby chuckt » Mon Aug 19, 2019 2:38 am

DaneCurley wrote:The first response for this Q has been logged on TGDB. A 51-day wait, answered on August 17th.

It begins.


Anyone else think that must be an erroneous entry? Nothing in the results thread.
36 R,R,R, SHM

User avatar
disgruntledpeony
Posts: 1114
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2015 7:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby disgruntledpeony » Mon Aug 19, 2019 2:59 am

chuckt wrote:
DaneCurley wrote:The first response for this Q has been logged on TGDB. A 51-day wait, answered on August 17th.

It begins.


Anyone else think that must be an erroneous entry? Nothing in the results thread.

I figure it might be erroneous, yeah. A Q2 that accidentally got marked as a Q3, maybe?
If a person offend you, and you are in doubt as to whether it was intentional or not, do not resort to extreme measures; simply watch your chance and hit him with a brick. ~ Mark Twain

R, SF, SHM, SHM, SHM, F, R, HM, SHM, R, HM, R, F

User avatar
chuckt
Posts: 270
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2019 9:12 am

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby chuckt » Mon Aug 19, 2019 3:06 am

There is another rejection logged on Duotrope. Aug 16. Maybe the same person and same error.
36 R,R,R, SHM

User avatar
DaneCurley
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2019 12:22 pm

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby DaneCurley » Mon Aug 19, 2019 3:24 am

But I'm sure there are plenty of participants who do not engage on this forum.

User avatar
chuckt
Posts: 270
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2019 9:12 am

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby chuckt » Mon Aug 19, 2019 3:48 am

DaneCurley wrote:But I'm sure there are plenty of participants who do not engage on this forum.


True. I hope they are rolling out.
36 R,R,R, SHM

User avatar
JVAshley
Posts: 247
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 5:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby JVAshley » Mon Aug 19, 2019 7:25 am

It might be an error, but I am ready to start twitching. I am obviously a glutton for punishment and my story is too short to be a real contender BUT I do love to twitch.

Soooo, I'll be under the table rearranging the blanket fort until the rest of you get here. wotf035
1x SF
3x HM
2x R

Corbin Maxwell
Posts: 431
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:53 am

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby Corbin Maxwell » Mon Aug 19, 2019 8:40 am

JVAshley wrote:It might be an error, but I am ready to start twitching. I am obviously a glutton for punishment and my story is too short to be a real contender BUT I do love to twitch.

Soooo, I'll be under the table rearranging the blanket fort until the rest of you get here. wotf035



I tried to write a story once with magical blankets that when a character read a book beneath a blanket tee-pee, the blanket transported the reader into the book. Your blanket fort comment reminded me of that
For there is death in the sound of it, and a glamorous fatality, like silver pennons downrushing at sunset, or a dying fall of horns along the road to Ronceveaux.

The only easy day was yesterday.




SF x 1
HM x 10

User avatar
JVAshley
Posts: 247
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2015 5:37 pm
Contact:

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby JVAshley » Mon Aug 19, 2019 2:09 pm

Corbin Maxwell wrote:I tried to write a story once with magical blankets that when a character read a book beneath a blanket tee-pee, the blanket transported the reader into the book. Your blanket fort comment reminded me of that

I would enjoy your blanket tee-pee Corbin. Well, I suppose it depended which book I was reading, but I would like to give it a try.
1x SF
3x HM
2x R

Corbin Maxwell
Posts: 431
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:53 am

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby Corbin Maxwell » Mon Aug 19, 2019 2:36 pm

JVAshley wrote:
Corbin Maxwell wrote:I tried to write a story once with magical blankets that when a character read a book beneath a blanket tee-pee, the blanket transported the reader into the book. Your blanket fort comment reminded me of that

I would enjoy your blanket tee-pee Corbin. Well, I suppose it depended which book I was reading, but I would like to give it a try.


The book of course is up to the reader. The reader picks, and then gets under the magical blanket, and away that person goes.
For there is death in the sound of it, and a glamorous fatality, like silver pennons downrushing at sunset, or a dying fall of horns along the road to Ronceveaux.

The only easy day was yesterday.




SF x 1
HM x 10

User avatar
Retropianoplayer
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:23 am
Location: Peoria, Arizona

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby Retropianoplayer » Mon Aug 19, 2019 5:30 pm

Hey Corbin,

You might find it interesting Hollywood produced a movie on a variation of your theme. INKHEART - where a teenage girl discovers her father has an amazing talent to bring characters out of their books and must try to stop a freed villain from destroying them all, with the help of her father, her aunt, and a storybook's hero.

THE PAGEMASTER - "A cowardly boy, who buries himself in accident statistics, enters a library to escape a storm, only to be transformed into an animated illustration by the Pagemaster. He has to work through obstacles from classic books to return to real life.

So who knows? Write your ideas down, and maybe Hollywood will do an adaptation of your story.

Best,

Retropianoplayer

User avatar
DoctorJest
Posts: 190
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2014 11:18 pm
Location: California
Contact:

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby DoctorJest » Mon Aug 19, 2019 5:51 pm

The novel Inkheart was a ton of fun, and stands as one of my favourite books. I was a little disappointed that the movie never found enough of an audience, as I'd have liked to see the other two make it to the screen.
WotF: R:0 / HM:6 / sHM:2 / SF:0 / F:0
Currently working on entry for Q1.v37...

Corbin Maxwell
Posts: 431
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:53 am

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby Corbin Maxwell » Mon Aug 19, 2019 5:53 pm

Retropianoplayer wrote:Hey Corbin,

You might find it interesting Hollywood produced a movie on a variation of your theme. INKHEART - where a teenage girl discovers her father has an amazing talent to bring characters out of their books and must try to stop a freed villain from destroying them all, with the help of her father, her aunt, and a storybook's hero.

THE PAGEMASTER - "A cowardly boy, who buries himself in accident statistics, enters a library to escape a storm, only to be transformed into an animated illustration by the Pagemaster. He has to work through obstacles from classic books to return to real life.

So who knows? Write your ideas down, and maybe Hollywood will do an adaptation of your story.

Best,

Retropianoplayer


I don’t think I saw those movies. I may have but I don’t remember.

I’m currently 32k into a book which is a bit darker than magical blankets and such. I liked my idea of the blankets but just didn’t have the writing skills or whatever to develop it into a story.

I guess I don’t really expect to ever sell anything. It would seem my writing style is not very popular with editors. But I write because I cannot not write. If that makes any sense.
For there is death in the sound of it, and a glamorous fatality, like silver pennons downrushing at sunset, or a dying fall of horns along the road to Ronceveaux.

The only easy day was yesterday.




SF x 1
HM x 10

User avatar
Retropianoplayer
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:23 am
Location: Peoria, Arizona

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby Retropianoplayer » Mon Aug 19, 2019 6:00 pm

Hey Corbin,

That's defeatist talk. You're better . . . much better than that. Dude, you have ten Honorable Mentions and one Semi-Finalist and you're seriously questioning your abilities. DON'T.

You will sell something. Send those thoughts into the universe.

I suggest you watch the movie REBEL IN THE RYE. Jerome David Salinger was turned down, verbally abused, and completely misunderstood by editors.
This is the guy who created Holden Caulfield, CATCHER IN THE RYE, and his writing kept him alive during the worst of World War 2 when he was drafted. Seeing his buddies blown to bits in The Battle Of The Bulge and seeing the Nazi concentration camps, the very idea of his story kept him alive. The bitterness of his dealings with editors made him tell his literary agent he REFUSED to ever be published again. And he remained unpublished until I think he died at 91 or 92 in complete seclusion.

Don't give up.

Best,

Retropianoplayer

Corbin Maxwell
Posts: 431
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 11:53 am

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby Corbin Maxwell » Mon Aug 19, 2019 6:04 pm

All of my WOTF accomplishments happened with KD Wentworth. DF rejected me three times in a row which I know is part of the process. Rejections don’t get me down. I write because I love to write.
For there is death in the sound of it, and a glamorous fatality, like silver pennons downrushing at sunset, or a dying fall of horns along the road to Ronceveaux.

The only easy day was yesterday.




SF x 1
HM x 10

User avatar
Retropianoplayer
Posts: 84
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2019 11:23 am
Location: Peoria, Arizona

Re: Discussion: Q3 Volume 36

Postby Retropianoplayer » Mon Aug 19, 2019 6:17 pm

Corbin,

I know that, dude. Or we wouldn't be having this conversation.

Without being a broken record, Hang in There!

At least you're not cold-calling production companies and getting hung up on because you can't attach an A-list actor to your project, or because you're not represented by the #1 elite agency in Hollywood and they can't take your call.


Best,

Retropianoplayer


Return to “The Contest - Quarterly Topics, and Other Items”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: disgruntledpeony and 2 guests