Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2017 4:56 am
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
LittleRed -
Did you have to send your story to Joni in an email because the site was down? If not, sounds like you might have a semi finalist.
Did you have to send your story to Joni in an email because the site was down? If not, sounds like you might have a semi finalist.
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
i entered as usual -- got the confirmation back ages ago. so ... no?? Trying not to get my hopes too high. lol
If this world holds no wonder, it is no place for me.
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2017 4:56 am
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
Although we also haven’t seen SHMs yet.
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
Ahhh --- that makes sense too , KristyEmber
If this world holds no wonder, it is no place for me.
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
I have a question regarding these things, and if it's been answered somewhere then feel free to give me the hose again. If you get an R on a technicality, is there any way to know this? This might be completely wishful thinking, but I recently became aware of the Microsoft Word meta data it includes in the files and I opened up some past entries and found that my name was in the info under "Last Updated By".
Each time I get an R, I put my brain through a ringer trying to figure out what was wrong with my story. I study the hell out of everything David puts out, and I have (so far) about 6 of the anthologies, and I read the winning entries. I try to outdo myself each time. I think the hardest part is trying to figure out what you got wrong on the story. I feel like I'm shooting in the dark. What if what I think is wrong is not the thing that was wrong? Lastly, what if the story was actually great, but you messed up a technical issue?
Each time I get an R, I put my brain through a ringer trying to figure out what was wrong with my story. I study the hell out of everything David puts out, and I have (so far) about 6 of the anthologies, and I read the winning entries. I try to outdo myself each time. I think the hardest part is trying to figure out what you got wrong on the story. I feel like I'm shooting in the dark. What if what I think is wrong is not the thing that was wrong? Lastly, what if the story was actually great, but you messed up a technical issue?
R R HM R R
Everwind.us
Everwind.us
- disgruntledpeony
- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2015 7:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
ddonche wrote:I have a question regarding these things, and if it's been answered somewhere then feel free to give me the hose again. If you get an R on a technicality, is there any way to know this? This might be completely wishful thinking, but I recently became aware of the Microsoft Word meta data it includes in the files and I opened up some past entries and found that my name was in the info under "Last Updated By".
Each time I get an R, I put my brain through a ringer trying to figure out what was wrong with my story. I study the hell out of everything David puts out, and I have (so far) about 6 of the anthologies, and I read the winning entries. I try to outdo myself each time. I think the hardest part is trying to figure out what you got wrong on the story. I feel like I'm shooting in the dark. What if what I think is wrong is not the thing that was wrong? Lastly, what if the story was actually great, but you messed up a technical issue?
There's no way to know that, no. That's why I always triple check before I submit.
Trading crits with other people can also provide a buffer of sorts, of course--at the very least, it can gain something in the way of feedback.
If a person offend you, and you are in doubt as to whether it was intentional or not, do not resort to extreme measures; simply watch your chance and hit him with a brick. ~ Mark Twain
R, SF, SHM, SHM, SHM, F, R, HM, SHM, R, HM, R, F
R, SF, SHM, SHM, SHM, F, R, HM, SHM, R, HM, R, F
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
LittleRed wrote:Thanks TimE. All these crickets chirping have me convinced the entry has fallen down a crack somewhere. Last Q the response popped up as a surprise. I should never have started email watching. (nervous grin and foot shuffle)
When that chirping happens, and results are all in except the finalists, and you didn't get the call, it likely means you're a semifinalist. Or your entry got lost. Take your pick. : )
Wulf Moon http://driftweave.com
Q4 Vol 35 "Super-Duper Moongirl..."
Critters Readers Award: #1, "War Dog," Best SF&F Short Story of 2018
NEW! "Weep No More..." DEEP MAGIC Fall 2019 http://amazon.com/author/wulfmoon
Q4 Vol 35 "Super-Duper Moongirl..."
Critters Readers Award: #1, "War Dog," Best SF&F Short Story of 2018
NEW! "Weep No More..." DEEP MAGIC Fall 2019 http://amazon.com/author/wulfmoon
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
ddonche wrote:I have a question regarding these things, and if it's been answered somewhere then feel free to give me the hose again. If you get an R on a technicality, is there any way to know this? This might be completely wishful thinking, but I recently became aware of the Microsoft Word meta data it includes in the files and I opened up some past entries and found that my name was in the info under "Last Updated By".
Each time I get an R, I put my brain through a ringer trying to figure out what was wrong with my story. I study the hell out of everything David puts out, and I have (so far) about 6 of the anthologies, and I read the winning entries. I try to outdo myself each time. I think the hardest part is trying to figure out what you got wrong on the story. I feel like I'm shooting in the dark. What if what I think is wrong is not the thing that was wrong? Lastly, what if the story was actually great, but you messed up a technical issue?
This is Rejectomancy. It's a dangerous path to go down. As always, you know my advice. Send it out. And write your next.
Wulf Moon http://driftweave.com
Q4 Vol 35 "Super-Duper Moongirl..."
Critters Readers Award: #1, "War Dog," Best SF&F Short Story of 2018
NEW! "Weep No More..." DEEP MAGIC Fall 2019 http://amazon.com/author/wulfmoon
Q4 Vol 35 "Super-Duper Moongirl..."
Critters Readers Award: #1, "War Dog," Best SF&F Short Story of 2018
NEW! "Weep No More..." DEEP MAGIC Fall 2019 http://amazon.com/author/wulfmoon
-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 12:25 am
- Location: Spain
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
I'm wondering what happened with the SHM. Did none of us forumites get one or are they doing away with that type of honor or is it being delayed like semi finalists?
3 x HM
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
ddonche wrote:Each time I get an R, I put my brain through a ringer trying to figure out what was wrong with my story. I study the hell out of everything David puts out, and I have (so far) about 6 of the anthologies, and I read the winning entries. I try to outdo myself each time. I think the hardest part is trying to figure out what you got wrong on the story.
This is me. As I've said before, I know there were problems with my two stories that got HM's. All my R's seemed to be better stories to me. I can only put it down to originality.
5*R 3*HM - I thought I was getting closer, but perhaps not.
CWA-Debut Dagger shortlist. https://thecwa.co.uk/colours/ (Still trying to find my genre - but perhaps it scifi!)
CWA-Debut Dagger shortlist. https://thecwa.co.uk/colours/ (Still trying to find my genre - but perhaps it scifi!)
- disgruntledpeony
- Posts: 1118
- Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2015 7:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
SCAFontaine wrote:I'm wondering what happened with the SHM. Did none of us forumites get one or are they doing away with that type of honor or is it being delayed like semi finalists?
It's probably delayed because SHM and semi-finalist are very close. I'm betting we'll see both of those at the same time. (I've seen it staggered this way more than once. Used to happen on the regular.)
If a person offend you, and you are in doubt as to whether it was intentional or not, do not resort to extreme measures; simply watch your chance and hit him with a brick. ~ Mark Twain
R, SF, SHM, SHM, SHM, F, R, HM, SHM, R, HM, R, F
R, SF, SHM, SHM, SHM, F, R, HM, SHM, R, HM, R, F
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
ddonche wrote:I have a question regarding these things, and if it's been answered somewhere then feel free to give me the hose again. If you get an R on a technicality, is there any way to know this? This might be completely wishful thinking, but I recently became aware of the Microsoft Word meta data it includes in the files and I opened up some past entries and found that my name was in the info under "Last Updated By".
Each time I get an R, I put my brain through a ringer trying to figure out what was wrong with my story. I study the hell out of everything David puts out, and I have (so far) about 6 of the anthologies, and I read the winning entries. I try to outdo myself each time. I think the hardest part is trying to figure out what you got wrong on the story. I feel like I'm shooting in the dark. What if what I think is wrong is not the thing that was wrong? Lastly, what if the story was actually great, but you messed up a technical issue?
Im a noob but, for what it's worth, I've gotten a lot of help from getting an experienced writer to critique my stories. I also paid a pro to look at my stuff and that was useful as well. I had some clunky things I was doing I didn't even know about like too many "to-be" verbs and repeating words. Finally, I'm signed up for a couple of writing craft workshops with pros in the sci-fi world. The Cons are a good place to look for these at reasonable prices. For example, Jodi Lynn Nye runs one at Dragoncon.
36 R,R,R, SHM
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
There are only twelve reports in the Grinder for WOTF this quarter. That leaves about 16 more to go. Given that Grinder users are only a tiny fraction of WOTF submitters, I doubt the unreported Grinder entries account for all the finalists and semifinalists. I therefore conclude there is at least one more wave to come. This impending wave will likely include all the SHMs and SFs, but will also some HMs and maybe even some Rs.
I speak from experience on this point, if you survived the first wave, it doesn't mean you are immune from a dreaded "You did not place" email.
On the other hand, the odds are now decidedly in your favor that you did place. So, eat some brownies, drink the beverage of your choice, and twitch.
I speak from experience on this point, if you survived the first wave, it doesn't mean you are immune from a dreaded "You did not place" email.
On the other hand, the odds are now decidedly in your favor that you did place. So, eat some brownies, drink the beverage of your choice, and twitch.
Trajectory HM R R HM R R HM HM HM R R R R HM R HM HM
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
Just finished copying notes from Dave's blog - 270 000 words (hope it's not illegal, I'll just read it and take notes). Keeping my head up. But I have a lot of work ahead.
Bare with my ignorance but isn't Wulf Moon last year's finalist? If yes, then I guess she couldn't take part in Q1 or no?
Bare with my ignorance but isn't Wulf Moon last year's finalist? If yes, then I guess she couldn't take part in Q1 or no?
chuckt wrote:ddonche wrote:I have a question regarding these things, and if it's been answered somewhere then feel free to give me the hose again. If you get an R on a technicality, is there any way to know this? This might be completely wishful thinking, but I recently became aware of the Microsoft Word meta data it includes in the files and I opened up some past entries and found that my name was in the info under "Last Updated By".
Each time I get an R, I put my brain through a ringer trying to figure out what was wrong with my story. I study the hell out of everything David puts out, and I have (so far) about 6 of the anthologies, and I read the winning entries. I try to outdo myself each time. I think the hardest part is trying to figure out what you got wrong on the story. I feel like I'm shooting in the dark. What if what I think is wrong is not the thing that was wrong? Lastly, what if the story was actually great, but you messed up a technical issue?
Im a noob but, for what it's worth, I've gotten a lot of help from getting an experienced writer to critique my stories. I also paid a pro to look at my stuff and that was useful as well. I had some clunky things I was doing I didn't even know about like too many "to-be" verbs and repeating words. Finally, I'm signed up for a couple of writing craft workshops with pros in the sci-fi world. The Cons are a good place to look for these at reasonable prices. For example, Jodi Lynn Nye runs one at Dragoncon.
- Dustin Adams
- Posts: 1614
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:47 am
- Location: NY, state of
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
Commiser-grats all. Q1 is a beast of waiting.
Now those who haven't heard get to wait even harder!
Now those who haven't heard get to wait even harder!
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36



Hugs and handshakes to those who've placed and didn't so far. The waiting is over for me - Semi-Finalist.
Could knock me over with a feather. This one had such a dark ending I figured it would die quietly in the shadows.
V. interested to see the crit notes.
Fingers crossed for everyone still waiting.
If this world holds no wonder, it is no place for me.
- AnikeKirsten
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 6:58 am
- Location: South Africa
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
Congrats, LittleRed!
- V.35: Q4 - SHM
- V.36: Q1 - HM | V.36: Q2 - R (thanks OpenOffice) | V.36: Q4 - Pending
- V.37: Q1 - Pending
First pro sale in Nature: Futures, and 3 Stories in Avescope Magazine.
- V.36: Q1 - HM | V.36: Q2 - R (thanks OpenOffice) | V.36: Q4 - Pending
- V.37: Q1 - Pending
First pro sale in Nature: Futures, and 3 Stories in Avescope Magazine.
- Dragonchef
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2014 7:53 am
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
Woop! Woop! Little Red - you go! Nice.
R = 4
HM = 1(Q4v36)
SHM = 1 (Q3v32)
WINs = Zip
F = Zero
SF = Zilcho

HM = 1(Q4v36)
SHM = 1 (Q3v32)
WINs = Zip
F = Zero
SF = Zilcho

-
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2018 12:25 am
- Location: Spain
- thegirlintheglasses
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 8:50 pm
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
Go Little Red! That's awesome!!!!
Brittany Rainsdon
R-SHM-HM-R-HM-R-F-F-HM-HM-HM
John Goodwin asked me to type up a blog post about writing my wotf entry around giving birth. Here it is!
https://www.writersofthefuture.com/birt ... -rainsdon/
R-SHM-HM-R-HM-R-F-F-HM-HM-HM
John Goodwin asked me to type up a blog post about writing my wotf entry around giving birth. Here it is!
https://www.writersofthefuture.com/birt ... -rainsdon/
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
Thanks guys for celebrating with me! Looking forward to one of us being this quarter's winner. :)
If this world holds no wonder, it is no place for me.
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
SF is a great achievement. And but for that dark ending...
Well done.
Well done.
5*R 3*HM - I thought I was getting closer, but perhaps not.
CWA-Debut Dagger shortlist. https://thecwa.co.uk/colours/ (Still trying to find my genre - but perhaps it scifi!)
CWA-Debut Dagger shortlist. https://thecwa.co.uk/colours/ (Still trying to find my genre - but perhaps it scifi!)
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36

Van Alrik
V33 (-- HM SHM R), V34 (SF R R HM), V35 (HM R R R),
V36 (R HM F HM), V37 (Q1-Pending)
Latest sold story (10 total):
"The Church of Raw," Thuggish Itch: Scientific, Oct. 2018
V33 (-- HM SHM R), V34 (SF R R HM), V35 (HM R R R),
V36 (R HM F HM), V37 (Q1-Pending)
Latest sold story (10 total):
"The Church of Raw," Thuggish Itch: Scientific, Oct. 2018
- DoctorJest
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2014 11:18 pm
- Location: California
- Contact:
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
LittleRed wrote:Could knock me over with a feather. This one had such a dark ending I figured it would die quietly in the shadows.
Congratulations! I always wondered about the darkness thing, too -- my only SHM was also the darkest story I submitted to WotF to date. I suspect that while Dave may not go for the dark ones, if you're pulling on the right strings with it, you're still in with a shout. :-)
WotF: R:0 / HM:6 / sHM:2 / SF:0 / F:0
Currently working on entry for Q1.v37...
Currently working on entry for Q1.v37...
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
DoctorJest wrote:LittleRed wrote:Could knock me over with a feather. This one had such a dark ending I figured it would die quietly in the shadows.
Congratulations! I always wondered about the darkness thing, too -- my only SHM was also the darkest story I submitted to WotF to date. I suspect that while Dave may not go for the dark ones, if you're pulling on the right strings with it, you're still in with a shout. :-)
Based on current experience I have to agree with you,though I'm guessing it still may be hard to hit the top three with dark endings
If this world holds no wonder, it is no place for me.
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
LittleRed wrote:Hugs and handshakes to those who've placed and didn't so far. The waiting is over for me - Semi-Finalist.

1x SF
3x HM
2x R
3x HM
2x R
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
disgruntledpeony wrote:LDWriter2 wrote:Hmm, Heard about Dave's heart attack and all that. Therefore there will be delays with the results. Okay, under the circumstances I have no problem with. But did he send out some rejections before the heart attack? I remember a rejection, maybe, for quarter one. Maybe I am remembering the previous quarter's rejection but seems like there was something about One a while back.
As far as I know, there haven't been any rejections yet for this quarter.
Finally got back here. It took a week to get back onto the internet and then my habit of not coming here kicked in. I am taking care of business, online, having to do with moving, so decided I better come here.
Anyway, thanks for the response.
Working on turning Lead into Gold.
Four HMs From WotF
The latest was Q1'12
HM-quarter 4 Volume 32
One HM for another contest
published in Strange New Worlds Ten.
Another HM http://onthepremises.com/minis/mini_18.html
Four HMs From WotF
The latest was Q1'12
HM-quarter 4 Volume 32
One HM for another contest
published in Strange New Worlds Ten.
Another HM http://onthepremises.com/minis/mini_18.html
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
I had asked something a while back about previous rejections but now I know the answer. A rejection-complete of course.
Working on turning Lead into Gold.
Four HMs From WotF
The latest was Q1'12
HM-quarter 4 Volume 32
One HM for another contest
published in Strange New Worlds Ten.
Another HM http://onthepremises.com/minis/mini_18.html
Four HMs From WotF
The latest was Q1'12
HM-quarter 4 Volume 32
One HM for another contest
published in Strange New Worlds Ten.
Another HM http://onthepremises.com/minis/mini_18.html
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
Congrats LittleRed!
My contest history:
V32Q3 - SHM/V33Q2 - R
'Every man is my superior in that I may learn from him.'
V32Q3 - SHM/V33Q2 - R
'Every man is my superior in that I may learn from him.'
Re: Discussion: Q1 Volume 36
Thanks TimE, OldDarth and everyone else I missed. Still got my eyes peeled for those lurking finalists and winners.
Bet you're hiding in here somewhere.
Bet you're hiding in here somewhere.
If this world holds no wonder, it is no place for me.
Return to “The Contest - Quarterly Topics, and Other Items”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests